![]() Typically using a photograph as reference won't yield any direct representative copy of that photograph and if one is using a photo as reference there's rarely a desire to replicate the photo as close as possible. A vector recreation of a raster image is derivative at best and most often is an infringement. Or using Illustrator to place the photograph as a template for drawing on top of, etc. This includes things like painting over a photograph in Photoshop. However, if one uses a photograph as a tracing basis - meaning you use some automated or manual method to directly mimic the object(s) within the photograph, then yes it is often infringement or at a minimum derivative work ( 2). I would need to use photographs as reference. There's no way I could travel the south pole to view penguins in their natural habitat. I mean, there's no way I can travel to Giza to personally look at the pyramids in order to draw them. Using reference is exceptionally common and almost mandatory at times. If you merely look at a photograph and draw based on what you see, there's rarely any infringement. It is something done to make it more difficult to download files in question.One needs to clarify the usage and intent. Thus, if the fear was that searching for such would give out details (perhaps your IP address and so forth), it is not something that is actively being pursued from this netblock through these results. All it is saying is that there does not appear to be any sort of active connection made between your own personal computer and anything on this netblock for those searches. It is not saying that the results are not happening. For those who do not understand what is meant by that, it is not saying that the block is wrong. Absolutely nothing came up as being stopped at an IP level which would simply suggest that there is absolutely no connection made between the flooding clients and the user, if it is, in fact, accurate. I then went on to perform a search for a release which is known to cause the flood of results. ![]() ![]() For the sake of curiosity, I went about acquiring the PeerGuardian software, free of any 'blocklists', which I then went on to add the netblock to as a sole range. I regards to the netblock posted, I have seen suggestion towards it previously. I should of looked a bit further, this thread explains it I know I appreciate it when people share with me and it’s the nature of the thing after all. I am going to remove most of my major label artist because I want to keep sharing. So who really knows? I will still share with the whole network but won’t d/l from people with three numbers in their name. * Targeted promotional services for companies to capitalize on previously untapped revenue streams across content sharing networks. * Highly effective anti-piracy solutions to disrupt the illegal sharing of copyrighted material * Provides view into over 25 billion attempted transmissions every month from 150 million unique users ![]() * Powerful data mining and analytical tools and comprehensive information on digital music, video, game and software usage They are never on-line if you try and message them and might be from this company Īlso highlighted what Overpeer does and got it from that thread: The thread is really not worth reading but these bots all use a name and than three numbers. This came up last month on the slsk board I'm not sure if it would be different with your example with the RIAA. Not one guy got out of it, and certainly none for entrapment. Every single DOD member investigated that went to court was slapped with a guilty conviction too. Their most famous release was a cracked version of Windows 95 a few months before it went retail.īack in late-2000, 2001 the FBI started a warez site called Super Dimensional Fortress Macross (SDFM) and it became affiliated with DOD. There was a well known group named DOD, Drink or Die, that cracked software. I'm not an expert here, but the FBI uses that method to bust warez groups. Were the RIAA to create a campaign of enticing P2P users to download files from them, it'd be pretty hypocritical and counterproductive. On the issue of the RIAA targeting users who download files from RIAA personnel, I think this isn't the focus of the RIAA, and may even approach entrapment (at least in the US).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |